The Big Bang Theory is not Behind the Cosmos Evolution said a Scientist

Breakthrough research can challenge Big Bang Theory and Physics

The Big Bang Theory was the leading explanation for how the universe began. At its simplest, it says the world as we recognize it began with a small singularity, then extended over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we see today. It might be the most conventional theory of the origin of the universe, but the new analysis suggests the Big Bang theory may have never occurred.

A physicist Juliano César Silva Neves, at the University of Campinas in São Paulo, now proposes that might be wrong, in a paper published in the journal General Relativity and Gravitation.

Scientist Georges Lemaître first laid the groundwork for the Big Bang theory in the 1920s when he suggested an eternally-expanding world. Cosmologist Edwin Hubble’s discovery, proclaimed in 1929, that galaxies are evolving ever far away from one another at faster speed was taken as a critical initial piece of evidence that the cosmos started from a single point.

But Neves’s group offers an alternative description. Challenging the idea that time had a starting, they recommend that the state of extension in the universe came after a state of compression. In other words, rather than coming from a single significant expansion or a bang, the latest paper proposes that a long contraction or crunch preceded that development.

These all put a question that how can you test a theory about what happened billions of years ago? According to Neves, the answer is to look at black holes and other evidence from when the universe may have first created.

Neves told that who knows, there may be remains of black holes in the continuing development that date from the earlier contraction phase and passed whole through the bottleneck of the bounce. In other words, Neves considers that there may be remnants of black holes that predate the contraction-expansion, and they may offer proof to prove it.

This indicates the universe did not experience a violent beginning or end, as explained in the Big Bang and Big Crunch scenarios.

About the author

Saloni Sharma

Saloni Sharma is an environmental activist with broad, deep experience in print and online writing, publication and site management, news coverage, and editorial team management.

1 Comment

Click here to post a comment

  • Gravity is at the root of the solution.

    Nature follows a very simple set of rules when it
    comes to how and why gravity works. Nature has no problem with the principles
    … the question to answer is do you have a problem with the principles?

    The principles of atomic gravity are a description
    of how gravity works at the atomic scale. The principles are fundamental in the
    natural world.

    The academics behind the research presented in the
    above article should be first in line to explore all solutions. Words like
    maybe, possibly or hopefully are not an effective part of the scientific

    Academia’s current teachings that gravity is a
    geometric construct, not a force has really inhibited innovation and discovery
    in this area of research.

    A similar
    academic situation occurred during the time of Galileo when academia taught
    that the Earth was the center of the universe.

    The answers begin by understanding how gravity works
    at the atomic scale. The principles of atomic gravity are simple and have been
    proven over and over again.

    Discover the principles in the google links below.

    innovate, and solve the problem outside the academic box. Only the motivated
    and talented need apply the principles to their specific area(s) of research.

    Atomic Gravity Summary


    Zero G flight at the Atomic Scale

    A Canadian innovation.

You Might Also Like